IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v2y1999i1p3-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of environmental health risk management: a US perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Gail Charnley

Abstract

The US environmental protection system is evolving toward more inclusive, democratic approaches to regulatory decision-making; away from command-and-control regulation towards more flexible, goal-oriented approaches; and towards recognition of the need for more of a top-down, public health and ecological context instead of relying solely on a bottom-up, chemical-by-chemical context. Those evolutionary tendencies are consistent with-and partly due to-the recommendations of the US Presidential/ Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, which was mandated to evaluate risk-related federal decision-making processes. As European Union (EU) member countries go about establishing strategies for environmental health risk management, the Risk Commission would like to suggest that the following three overarching recommendations be considered:(1) To make effective decisions and build on the tremendous environmental improvements that have been achieved over the last 25 years, think about risks collectively, comprehensively, and in their largerpublic health and environmental contexts. (2) Seek performance-based, market-based, and other flexible approaches to regulation instead of command-and-control. (3) Include those who are affected by risk-management decisions in the decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Gail Charnley, 1999. "The evolution of environmental health risk management: a US perspective," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 3-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:2:y:1999:i:1:p:3-10
    DOI: 10.1080/136698799376952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/136698799376952
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/136698799376952?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:2:y:1999:i:1:p:3-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.