IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v27y2024i7p735-769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk guidance and anti-corruption language: evidence from corporate codes of conduct

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Bogachek
  • Miles Gietzmann
  • Francesco Grossetti

Abstract

Multinational firms often face challenges doing business in countries where corruption is common practice in the business environment. This study examines anticorruption guidance provided in the corporate Codes of Conduct (CoC). We evaluate if this guidance is consistent with the firm-specific idiosyncratic exposure to corruption, or if corporate ‘tone from the top’ (TTT) uses only broad brush general language ‘impression management’ in an attempt to appear compliant. We also explore the interaction between anti-corruption guidance and audit oversight. Using quantitative textual analysis on a sample of Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 firms’ CoC, we develop a measure of anti-corruption language based on the most prevalent topics covered in these documents. We find the positive association between the anti-corruption topics and the firm-adjusted level of corruption risk. That is, the language used varies depending upon idiosyncratic firm risk, suggesting CoC is not simply used for impression management. We also identify a non-linear relationship in which audit oversight is observed as increasingly important in the most severe corrupt settings. Our results could be useful to practitioners and policymakers who may care about the information content of CoC when evaluating a firm’s risk management practices. We also show that when the corruption risk is sufficiently high, the anti-corruption TTT needs to be supplemented by other control activities such as audit oversight.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Bogachek & Miles Gietzmann & Francesco Grossetti, 2024. "Risk guidance and anti-corruption language: evidence from corporate codes of conduct," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(7), pages 735-769, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:7:p:735-769
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2023.2181857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2023.2181857
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2023.2181857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:7:p:735-769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.