IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v27y2024i5-6p664-666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflection on ‘risk analysis and uncertainty: what does this mean for the Dutch energy transition’ by Frederic Bouder and Ragnar Lofstedt

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Dirk Jansen
  • Rien Herber

Abstract

A general trend in the use of the Dutch deep subsurface is a shift from hydrocarbon production to geothermal energy production and subsurface storage of CO2 and H2. A broad mistrust by the general public, and many local governments, of any deep-subsurfacerelated activity leads to an increasing tendency to block any development that might potentially cause harm to humans or the environment. A complicating factor in this respect is the uncertainty surrounding new technology and the lack of related historical data (notably seismic records). We support the opinion of Boulder and Lofstedt (2024) that to effectively address this problem, we should avoid a dichotomy of acceptable versus unacceptable risks, as stimulated by the use of the precautionary principle. Instead, we should use a Tolerability Of Risk (TOR) approach with the As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) principle as key element.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Dirk Jansen & Rien Herber, 2024. "Reflection on ‘risk analysis and uncertainty: what does this mean for the Dutch energy transition’ by Frederic Bouder and Ragnar Lofstedt," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5-6), pages 664-666, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:5-6:p:664-666
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2024.2360903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2024.2360903
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2024.2360903?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:5-6:p:664-666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.