IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v27y2024i3p337-355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A risk science perspective on the COVID-19 risk handling

Author

Listed:
  • Terje Aven

Abstract

This paper provides some reflections on the risk handling of the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide: What went wrong, and what worked well? On many issues – for example the origin of the coronavirus, societal lockdowns, and the effectiveness and safety of the vaccines – there are still considerable uncertainties and discussion. The paper aims to provide a new perspective on the risk handling, by studying such issues through the lens of risk science. This perspective stimulates considerations of the dilemmas the authorities faced because of the uncertainties about the development of the disease and the effectiveness of measures to meet the risks, by looking into the role of science, the appropriateness of the precautionary principle, the need to establish some official narratives, and the use of misinformation/disinformation. The main conclusion of the paper is that the COVID-19 risk handling failed in many critical ways, many of which are due to the authorities’ failure to adequately provide information about the dilemmas and convey relevant risks and uncertainties.

Suggested Citation

  • Terje Aven, 2024. "A risk science perspective on the COVID-19 risk handling," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 337-355, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:3:p:337-355
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2024.2340019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2024.2340019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2024.2340019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:3:p:337-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.