IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v27y2024i11p1442-1460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community safety through mindfulness: a study on Chinese Grid Workers’ risk reporting behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Yuzhao Xie

Abstract

Existing literature highlights the role of mindfulness in enhancing safety and reliability across various organizational contexts. However, its impact on community safety behavior remains underexplored, and the mechanism through which mindfulness operates is not fully understood. This paper focuses on China’s most fundamental social governance unit—the Grid (网格)—which is responsible for identifying and issuing early warning. Conducting a scenario-based survey among Grid Workers in two regions (N = 1116), this study employs Propensity Score Matching and Ordered Logistic Regression to address two key questions: whether mindfulness enhances risk information reporting and how it influences resistance to cognitive bias. The findings reveal that: (1) mindfulness significantly increases the likelihood of risk information reporting; and (2) mindfulness does not mitigate familiarity heuristic or help deservingness heuristic bias. Surprisingly, mindfulness appears to amplify the impact of the help deservingness heuristic. The results suggest that promoting mindfulness among community front line workers can enhance risk detection and response, thereby contributing to public safety. However, the study indicates that mindfulness has limited efficacy in reducing cognitive biases.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuzhao Xie, 2024. "Community safety through mindfulness: a study on Chinese Grid Workers’ risk reporting behavior," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(11), pages 1442-1460, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:11:p:1442-1460
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2025.2466542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2025.2466542
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2025.2466542?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:11:p:1442-1460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.