IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v27y2024i11p1358-1377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government trust in turbulence: how do natural disasters affect public risk perception in China?

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaozhou Liu
  • Shuang Ling
  • Jinlong Li
  • Ni Jie

Abstract

In the context of frequent natural disasters, the public’s perception of risk has emerged as a critical social concern. This research, informed by the Social Amplification of Risk framework, delves into the influence of natural disaster shocks on the public’s risk perception, with a particular focus on the mediating role of government trust levels within China’s tiered system of trust. By leveraging micro-data from the Chinese Social Survey and macro-data on socio-economic progress spanning 2013, 2017, and 2021, empirical research has delineated a significant spillover effect of natural disaster shocks on the positive influence of public disaster risk perception. This impact transcends the risk perception of disasters, further amplifying the public’s awareness of societal risks, with the caveat that such spillover effects are finite in extent. Further mechanistic analyses reveal that government trust is crucial to mediating the relationship between disaster shocks and disaster/social risk perception. While grassroots and local government trust partially mediate this relationship, natural disaster shocks have no statistically significant indirect effect on public risk perception through central government trust. These findings underscore the externalities of risk shocks on public risk perceptions and provide valuable insights for enhancing the natural disaster preparedness system and promoting comprehensive natural disaster preparedness across society.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaozhou Liu & Shuang Ling & Jinlong Li & Ni Jie, 2024. "Government trust in turbulence: how do natural disasters affect public risk perception in China?," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(11), pages 1358-1377, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:11:p:1358-1377
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2025.2466533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2025.2466533
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2025.2466533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:11:p:1358-1377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.