Author
Listed:
- Beth Armstrong
- Darren Bhattachary
- Alex Bogdan
- Caitlin Connors
- Laura Broomfield
- Joanna Disson
- Rebecca Gillespie
- Helen Heard
- Alice John
- Lucy King
- Marfot Miah
- Ely Mirzahosseinkhan
- Michelle Patel
- Alice Rayner
- Sophie Watson
Abstract
The use of digital methods in social research has increased significantly, offering some benefits over traditional research methods, and some new challenges. The UK Food Standards Agency’s social science provides several case studies of how digital methods can be effectively utilized in practice. The agency has adopted various digital methods including web push surveys, online panels, online deliberative dialogue and citizen science platforms to gather data and gain insights into citizens’ attitudes and behaviours when it comes to the food system and food safety and standards. The implementation of these digital methods has allowed for more efficient data collection, and when applied with care and creativity can offer a high level of engagement and participation from the public. Furthermore, the use of citizen science platforms such as Zooniverse has allowed for the involvement of the general public in the research process, leading to increased public understanding and engagement with the research. The broad use of digital methods in social research as demonstrated by the UK Food Standards Agency’s social science highlights the utility of such methods for current and future research practices.
Suggested Citation
Beth Armstrong & Darren Bhattachary & Alex Bogdan & Caitlin Connors & Laura Broomfield & Joanna Disson & Rebecca Gillespie & Helen Heard & Alice John & Lucy King & Marfot Miah & Ely Mirzahosseinkhan &, 2023.
"Digital methods of social science in food regulation: case studies from the Food Standards Agency,"
Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 855-865, August.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:26:y:2023:i:8:p:855-865
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2023.2197616
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:26:y:2023:i:8:p:855-865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.