IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v24y2021i7p889-908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a generic risk maturity model (GRMM) for evaluating risk management in construction projects

Author

Listed:
  • Erfan Hoseini
  • Marcel Hertogh
  • Marian Bosch-Rekveldt

Abstract

The literature on risk management acknowledges a growing number of Risk Maturity Models (RMM). However, for the construction sector, there is no validated RMM that is based on both theory and experts’ opinions. In this article, a Generic RMM (GRMM), inspired by the EFQM model, is developed and validated to remedy this shortcoming. The GRMM uses a list of statements extracted from risk management literature by means of qualitative content analysis. The statements and the model are both validated by means of two focus group sessions, based on which the statements and the model are improved. According to the experts, the GRMM is easy to use and provides projects with a clear picture of potential improvements regarding risk management. Project managers can use the GRMM for planning and improving risk management, as well as for cross-project analysis for learning purposes. Further research on application of the GRMM in real projects is recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Erfan Hoseini & Marcel Hertogh & Marian Bosch-Rekveldt, 2021. "Developing a generic risk maturity model (GRMM) for evaluating risk management in construction projects," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(7), pages 889-908, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:24:y:2021:i:7:p:889-908
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2019.1646309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2019.1646309
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2019.1646309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:24:y:2021:i:7:p:889-908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.