Author
Listed:
- Aymeric Luneau
- Jean-Michel Fourniau
Abstract
Since its creation in 2010, the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES) has opened up its governance and risk assessment processes to the representatives of professional organisations, NGOs, trade unions and agricultural unions. In 2015, the head of ANSES gave us the opportunity to carry out a one-year inquiry focusing on the design of the agency’s participatory framework and the views of stakeholders about their involvement in work with ANSES. Relying on empirical analysis mixing quantitative and qualitative data, our paper gives an overview of the results of our inquiry.Firstly, we will describe how ANSES involves stakeholders. We will show that the agency’s participatory framework articulates a dialogic, consultative and informative procedure. Then, we will explore the reasons why stakeholders participate in ANSES’ committees. While the interviewed stakeholders perceive their membership at the agency as a key measure for strengthening their status in the field of risk governance, they point out the difficulty of seeing whether their participation has influenced ANSES’ strategy. We argue that this ‘lack of clarity’ follows from the segmentation of the three participatory procedures, which undermines the stakeholders’ ability to obtain a broad understanding of how the agency operates. Furthermore, since ANSES is responsible only for risk assessment, stakeholders at the agency’s committees see merely a fraction of a process that operates via other ‘arenas’ such as ministries. As a consequence, stakeholders must have a strong ‘interactional expertise’ to be able to grasp the slightest change in the agency’s strategy, which benefits in the first hand stakeholders that have been deeply involved in the French risk governance.
Suggested Citation
Aymeric Luneau & Jean-Michel Fourniau, 2021.
"Involving stakeholders in the risk regulation process: the example of ANSES,"
Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 740-755, June.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:24:y:2021:i:6:p:740-755
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2019.1687573
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:24:y:2021:i:6:p:740-755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.