IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v24y2021i6p721-739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk perceptions and emotional stability in response to Cyclone Debbie: an analysis of Twitter data

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Bec
  • Susanne Becken

Abstract

In March 2017, a category 4 cyclone, ‘Cyclone Debbie’, made landfall across the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) region of Australia. Drawing on the social amplification of risk framework and the concept of emotional stability, this research aims to provide insight into the perceptions of risk and individual responses to the disaster event using Twitter data, facilitating future analysis of social media messages during disaster events. This study uses Twitter data collected from the GBR region before, during and after Cyclone Debbie. Findings revealed changes in emotional stability across the stages of the cyclone. The findings suggested that statements revealing lower emotional stability were associated with amplified perceptions of risk, whilst increased emotional stability attenuated perceptions of risk. However, this was not the case for the characteristic ‘empathy’, which may have contributed to amplified perceptions of risk. Preparedness was also found to portray higher emotional stability characteristics. The findings have implications for future research analysing social media messages, as well as for disaster planning and response strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Bec & Susanne Becken, 2021. "Risk perceptions and emotional stability in response to Cyclone Debbie: an analysis of Twitter data," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 721-739, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:24:y:2021:i:6:p:721-739
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2019.1673798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2019.1673798
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2019.1673798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefano Morelli & Veronica Pazzi & Olga Nardini & Sara Bonati, 2022. "Framing Disaster Risk Perception and Vulnerability in Social Media Communication: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:24:y:2021:i:6:p:721-739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.