IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v24y2021i5p521-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence-based uncertainty analysis: What should we now do in Europe? A view point

Author

Listed:
  • Ragnar Lofstedt
  • Frederic Bouder

Abstract

There has been a great deal of discussion regarding both the communication of scientific uncertainties associated with regulatory decisions as well as the supposed need for more transparent uncertainty analyses associated with risk assessments themselves. More recently, in Europe this discussion has been led by the European Food Safety Authority’s Scientific Committee. In this viewpoint, we both review the ongoing debates surrounding uncertainty analysis as well as discuss some of the problems associated with communicating uncertainties. In the final section of the viewpoint, we offer some recommendations regarding what EFSA could do now going forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Ragnar Lofstedt & Frederic Bouder, 2021. "Evidence-based uncertainty analysis: What should we now do in Europe? A view point," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 521-540, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:24:y:2021:i:5:p:521-540
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2017.1316763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2017.1316763
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2017.1316763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:24:y:2021:i:5:p:521-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.