IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v23y2020i12p1650-1660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electromagnetic field exposure in power plants: a qualitative assessment of work safety perceptions among employees

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas A. M. Stege
  • John F. B. Bolte
  • Liesbeth Claassen
  • Danielle R. M. Timmermans

Abstract

Electromagnetic fields, or EMF, are ubiquitous in our daily life. Extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF MF) are generated by any device using electric current. Especially in workplace situations involving MRI scanners, welding equipment, induction heaters, and power plants, they are known for potentially high field strengths. These high field strengths may lead to adverse health effects if insufficient preventive measures are in place. This study investigates employees’ perceptions on work safety regarding EMF exposure. We held 15 semi-structured interviews in three different (non-nuclear) power plants in the Netherlands. We found that power plants in this study made ample use of fences and warning signs where needed, creating a safe working environment. Nevertheless, some workers perceive that there are vague regulations, organizational issues and lack of clarity on the properties of EMF. Participants also indicated that there is some room for improvement with respect to work safety meetings on EMF. Employees want to be informed about EMF and its potential health effects and mitigation methods, but their information need is limited and straightforward. A simple warning system, along with safety information on paper, may be sufficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas A. M. Stege & John F. B. Bolte & Liesbeth Claassen & Danielle R. M. Timmermans, 2020. "Electromagnetic field exposure in power plants: a qualitative assessment of work safety perceptions among employees," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(12), pages 1650-1660, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:23:y:2020:i:12:p:1650-1660
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1750459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2020.1750459
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2020.1750459?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:23:y:2020:i:12:p:1650-1660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.