IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v22y2019i6p701-716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transparency at the Swedish Forest Agency: What does the evidence show?

Author

Listed:
  • Ragnar Lofstedt

Abstract

Since February 2016, the Swedish Forest Agency (hereafter the ‘Agency’) has uploaded all requests for clear cuts on its Forest Data web-portal, which includes detailed forest maps which can be magnified online in order to pinpoint exactly where the clear cut is expected to take place (see https://skogskartan.skogsstyrelsen.se/skogskartan). The reason for doing so is to simplify the work of the Agency, as well as to assist forest and energy companies, environmental organizations and other bodies to get access to relevant information. In addition, the Agency believes that greater transparency will lead to more public trust and greater public understanding of the Swedish forest sector. In this study, evaluating the Agency’s transparency measure, it was uncovered that a majority of the Forest Agency’s board members and senior executives were in favour of the Agency’s transparency measures, something that a majority of the public interviewed also agreed with. Forest owners, however, had exactly the opposite view. That said, it is unclear whether the recently improved transparency measures will actually lead to greater public trust and knowledge of the Swedish forestry model. As most Swedes are unaware of how the Swedish forestry production model actually works, they will most likely be opposed to clear cuts if they found out that this was the main method for harvesting mature tree stands. Hence, the Agency’s transparency measures may actually decrease public trust in the forestry sector rather than anything else.

Suggested Citation

  • Ragnar Lofstedt, 2019. "Transparency at the Swedish Forest Agency: What does the evidence show?," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 701-716, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:22:y:2019:i:6:p:701-716
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2018.1460391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2018.1460391
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2018.1460391?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:22:y:2019:i:6:p:701-716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.