IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v22y2019i5p627-642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disgust sensitivity is associated with heightened risk perception

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Tobias Karg
  • Aaron Wiener-Blotner
  • Simone Schnall

Abstract

Disgust is a versatile emotion that is not only elicited by threats to one’s physical health but that has also recently been linked to social and especially moral concerns. Building on the hypothesis that disgust can be seen as part of a broader loss aversion system, four studies demonstrate that disgust sensitivity is linked to heightened risk perception. A preliminary study and Study 1 established a moderate correlation of disgust sensitivity with risk perception. Studies 2 and 3 confirmed the effect while controlling for potential affective influences, including current mood, or trait anxiety, respectively. Importantly, we find that the correlation is also independent of gender and age, and that disgust sensitivity is associated with a broad range of risk domains, including recreational, social, ethical, financial, and health and safety risks. Therefore, disgust may be part of a general risk aversion mechanism aimed at guiding behavior in uncertain situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Tobias Karg & Aaron Wiener-Blotner & Simone Schnall, 2019. "Disgust sensitivity is associated with heightened risk perception," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 627-642, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:22:y:2019:i:5:p:627-642
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2018.1474244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2018.1474244
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2018.1474244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:22:y:2019:i:5:p:627-642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.