IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v20y2017i5p590-610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exemplification effects: responses to perceptions of risk

Author

Listed:
  • Patric R. Spence
  • Kenneth A. Lachlan
  • David Westerman
  • Xialing Lin
  • Christina J. Harris
  • Timothy L. Sellnow
  • Deborah D. Sellnow-Richmond

Abstract

Exemplification theory asserts that message components that are iconic and emotionally arousing are easily accessed, and are therefore relied upon when making subsequent behavioral decisions. A reanalysis of data from three studies collected at different times, unrelated experimental stimuli (terrorism, food ingredients, and bed bugs), different media (visual and print), varying geographic locations, different experimental conditions (laboratory and online), and diverse participants suggests that these processes work differently for men and women. Results suggest that the medium through which an exemplar is presented and/or experienced may be fairly inconsequential, but there are underlying processes which may determine the extent to which individuals will modify behavioral intentions related to risks. After witnessing exemplified portrayals, women were more likely than men to express a desire to modify behavior, perceive themselves as more susceptible to the risk, and perceive the risk as being more severe across the studies. The findings are discussed in terms of directions for future research and implications for risk communication practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Patric R. Spence & Kenneth A. Lachlan & David Westerman & Xialing Lin & Christina J. Harris & Timothy L. Sellnow & Deborah D. Sellnow-Richmond, 2017. "Exemplification effects: responses to perceptions of risk," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 590-610, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:20:y:2017:i:5:p:590-610
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2015.1100658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2015.1100658
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2015.1100658?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:20:y:2017:i:5:p:590-610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.