IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v18y2015i7p860-876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing with future risks in the Netherlands: the National Security Strategy and the National Risk Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • M.G. Mennen
  • M.C. van Tuyll

Abstract

Threats to our safety and security are continuously changing and are becoming increasingly intertwined. Relatively minor threats can, through interdependencies, lead to societal disruption. In order to classify potential future risks, threats, and hazards and enhance adequate preparation and capacity building, the Dutch government approved a National Security Strategy. This all-hazard strategy includes both natural hazards and hazards caused by technical failure and malicious threats. Using this Strategy, the government is able to continually improve its overview of risks and to determine priorities regarding the allocation of resources for the prevention of, preparation for, and response to disasters. Analysis is performed using a methodology called the National Risk Assessment (NRA). In this methodology, future threats and hazards are described in scenarios, which are assessed in terms of likelihood and impact using a uniform scoring method and are therefore rendered comparable. The impact criteria reflect the five vital interests of the Netherlands: territorial security, physical safety (public health), economic security, ecological security, and social and political stability. The NRA is produced by an expert network consisting of research institutes, universities, civil services, public service corporations, and consultancy firms. On the basis of the NRA, a capabilities analysis is performed. This analysis assesses whether the country (government, private sector, and civilians) has sufficient capabilities (people, material, knowledge, skills, procedures) at its disposal to adequately deal with the threat, and considers which capabilities should be strengthened or developed. For example, the risk assessment of the occurrence of a pandemic flu showed that it could have crippling effects for the continuous functioning of critical infrastructure processes. As a response, Government and critical infrastructure companies developed business continuity plans for pandemic situations.

Suggested Citation

  • M.G. Mennen & M.C. van Tuyll, 2015. "Dealing with future risks in the Netherlands: the National Security Strategy and the National Risk Assessment," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 860-876, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:18:y:2015:i:7:p:860-876
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2014.923028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2014.923028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2014.923028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarzyna Rostek & Michał Wiśniewski & Witold Skomra, 2022. "Analysis and Evaluation of Business Continuity Measures Employed in Critical Infrastructure during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Henrik Hassel & Alexander Cedergren, 2019. "Exploring the Conceptual Foundation of Continuity Management in the Context of Societal Safety," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(7), pages 1503-1519, July.
    3. Aldona Frączkiewicz-Wronka & Tomasz Ingram & Karolina Szymaniec-Mlicka & Piotr Tworek, 2021. "Risk Management and Financial Stability in the Polish Public Hospitals: The Moderating Effect of the Stakeholders’ Engagement in the Decision-Making," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-23, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:18:y:2015:i:7:p:860-876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.