IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v18y2015i3p317-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structure, agency and post-Fukushima nuclear policy: an alliance-context-actantiality model of political change

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Cotton

Abstract

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster has radically reshaped domestic Japanese energy policy, political economy and citizen-state relationships within a very short time period. This destabilised period of post-Fukushima nuclear policy is considered in meta-theoretical terms, drawing upon the work of Colin Hay in describing a punctuated evolution model of stability and change. This, in turn, draws upon the concepts of structure and agency, and the material and ideational. I assess and apply Jessop and Hay's strategic-relational approach (SRA) to resolving these issues, with reference to the Fukushima disaster throughout. The ontological weaknesses of the SRA are discussed, namely the weak conceptualisation of 'the material', leading to the construction of a new hybrid model. Hay's concept of structure-strategy-agency is augmented into one of alliance-context-actantiality; drawing upon concepts from actor network theory to better articulate the role of artefacts, physical and material processes in influencing stability and change in risk politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Cotton, 2015. "Structure, agency and post-Fukushima nuclear policy: an alliance-context-actantiality model of political change," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 317-332, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:18:y:2015:i:3:p:317-332
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2014.919512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2014.919512
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2014.919512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:18:y:2015:i:3:p:317-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.