IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v18y2014i5p539-551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bad reputation: stigma as an inhibitor of risk behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Newby
  • Whitney DeCamp

Abstract

In recent years, it has been suggested that technological and scientific advancements have made the world a safer place, yet the fear of risk and threats to safety is higher than ever. This theory suggests that people are increasingly basing decisions about risk behaviors on the potential impact on their reputation. Specifically, the stigma of taking risks has been alleged to be a primary factor inhibiting risk-taking behavior. This claim, however, has remained theoretical and without empirical tests to determine its validity. The present study uses data collected from a random sample of college students, including data from open-ended responses to vignette-style questions, to assess the presence and impact of the fear of stigma as a factor in making decisions regarding risk behaviors. Results indicate that stigma is considered by individuals, but is not as meaningful an inhibitor as other factors, such as fear of harm and fear of harming others.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Newby & Whitney DeCamp, 2015. "Bad reputation: stigma as an inhibitor of risk behaviors," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 539-551, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:18:y:2014:i:5:p:539-551
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2014.910681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2014.910681
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2014.910681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:18:y:2014:i:5:p:539-551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.