IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v17y2014i2p161-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory safety barrier analysis: a case from the offshore maritime industry

Author

Listed:
  • Trond Kongsvik
  • Torgeir Haavik
  • Gudveig Gjøsund

Abstract

This paper argues that a participatory approach directly involving employees in safety barrier analysis can provide 'added value' to traditional barrier analyses. Employee participation (EP) could motivate employees to use their knowledge, suggest improvement measures and express their concerns. EP has not received much attention from safety researchers, although one may find several indirect arguments for EP informing the influential safety theoretical perspectives. An example of how participatory safety barrier analysis can be completed and what can be accomplished through such an approach is illustrated via a case study from an offshore logistics chain, and by an analysis of barriers that should prevent collisions between supply vessels and offshore installations. Such collisions could be the initiating event for a major accident. The empirical foundation for the paper is a hazard identification technique session, group and individual interviews, document studies and two search conferences involving approximately 150 participants. It is argued that a participatory approach to safety barrier analysis can reveal 'holes' in the defences that otherwise could have gone overlooked, and contribute to the generation of contextualized, definite measures that could strengthen a safety barrier system.

Suggested Citation

  • Trond Kongsvik & Torgeir Haavik & Gudveig Gjøsund, 2014. "Participatory safety barrier analysis: a case from the offshore maritime industry," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 161-175, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:17:y:2014:i:2:p:161-175
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2012.761275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2012.761275
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2012.761275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:17:y:2014:i:2:p:161-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.