IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v16y2013i1p19-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Romantic motives and risk-taking: an evolutionary approach

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Greitemeyer
  • Andreas Kastenmüller
  • Peter Fischer

Abstract

Risk-taking behavior is puzzling insofar as it may involve considerable losses (such as increased mortality rates). The present research advances an evolutionary account of risk-taking behavior in that one of its main functions is to get access to potential mating partners. Inasmuch as reproductive competition among men is more pronounced than among women, men in particular are expected to take risks in order to gain sexual access to women. In fact, four studies revealed that activating a mating goal was associated with men's propensity to risk-taking. Across a wide range of different risk-taking domains, a romantic motive increased men's reported willingness to take risks. In contrast, women's risk-taking was not affected by activating a mating motive. These findings suggest that risk-taking behavior has (in part) been evolved to enhance an individual's ability to attract a mate.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Greitemeyer & Andreas Kastenmüller & Peter Fischer, 2013. "Romantic motives and risk-taking: an evolutionary approach," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 19-38, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:16:y:2013:i:1:p:19-38
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2012.713388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2012.713388
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2012.713388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lorenza Lucchi Basili & Pier Luigi Sacco, 2017. "Tie-Up Cycles in Long-Term Mating. Part II: Fictional Narratives and the Social Cognition of Mating," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-60, February.
    2. Olga Semenova & Julia Apalkova & Marina Butovskaya, 2021. "Sex Differences in Spatial Activity and Anxiety Levels in the COVID-19 Pandemic from Evolutionary Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Ryan H. Murphy, 2019. "The rationality of literal Tide Pod consumption," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 111-122, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:16:y:2013:i:1:p:19-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.