IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v14y2011i4p467-484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk management and the record of the precautionary principle in EU case law

Author

Listed:
  • Michael D. Rogers

Abstract

The 'modern' approach to risk management fails with increasing scientific uncertainty. Risk regulators have responded to this difficulty by invoking the precautionary principle (PP). Under the PP, the bridge from risk assessment to risk management involves scenarios which use retrospective analyses to decide on future actions in order to avoid prospective harm. This new approach is termed 'post-modern' by some observers. In response to such 'post-modern' risks, the EU incorporated the PP into its primary law in 1992 and issued an explanatory Communication on the PP in 2000. The Communication presented five criteria that should govern precautionary actions and these criteria are now reflected in secondary laws in a number of sectors. Critically, the practical application of this body of law is being clarified through the case law of the EU courts. PP case law up to the end of 2008 is critically analysed in the light of the five criteria set out in the Commission's Communication. It is found that the first criterion (proportionality) is used effectively by the courts but that the fifth criterion (responding to the dynamics of scientific progress) is not. The paper concludes with a discussion regarding the future management of uncertain risks and the PP in the light of this case law.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael D. Rogers, 2011. "Risk management and the record of the precautionary principle in EU case law," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 467-484, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:14:y:2011:i:4:p:467-484
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2010.547255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2010.547255
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2010.547255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Alemanno, 2007. "The Shaping of the Precautionary Principle by European Courts: From Scientific Uncertainty to Legal Certainty," Post-Print hal-00639276, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vasco Barroso Gonçalves, 2020. "Uncertain Risk Assessment and Management: Case Studies of the Application of the Precautionary Principle in Portugal," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 939-956, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vural, Burçak Müge & Akgüngör, E. Sedef, 2019. "Quantifying the Trade and Welfare Effects of EU Aflatoxin Regulations on the Dried Fruit Industry," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(2), June.
    2. Sebastian Heselhaus, 2010. "Nanomaterials and the Precautionary Principle in the EU," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 91-108, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:14:y:2011:i:4:p:467-484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.