IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v13y2010i1p5-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Media and risk: old and new research directions

Author

Listed:
  • Vian Bakir

Abstract

A macro-view of the field of media and risk is offered by examining four main routes of media-risk research. These routes are the media's role in: providing risk knowledge to inform citizens; modulating public acceptability of different risks; motivating the public to take responsibility for, and action regarding, risks; and providing imaginative schemata regarding voluntarily chosen risks. Research tendencies in each of these routes are summarised and critiqued, with reference to methodology, theoretical frameworks and research foci, enabling articulation of new research directions. Methodologically, there is a need for more longitudinal, historical, contextual and interpretive studies of impacts of mediated risk at micro and macro levels, and more in-depth, comparative studies between different risk types across different media forms and genres. Greater empirical engagement with risk-oriented social theory such as risk society, governmentality, risk cultures and edgework would be productive. Under-explored research foci include: the gaps in knowledge within the Sociology of News; the features of risk that make it a risk issue and how these features interact with various media forms, genres and audiences; and impacts of the variations in audience trust in different media on their trust in mass-mediated risk knowledge and experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Vian Bakir, 2010. "Media and risk: old and new research directions," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 5-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:13:y:2010:i:1:p:5-18
    DOI: 10.1080/13669870903135953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669870903135953
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669870903135953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kate Holland & R. Warwick Blood & Michelle Imison & Simon Chapman & Andrea Fogarty, 2012. "Risk, expert uncertainty, and Australian news media: public and private faces of expert opinion during the 2009 swine flu pandemic," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 657-671, June.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:219-224 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Yixin Chen & Xinchuan Liu, 2021. "How Do Environmental News and the Under the Dome Documentary Influence Air-Pollution Knowledge and Risk Perception Among Beijing Residents?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    4. Xi Lu & Xiaofei Xie & Lu Liu, 2015. "Inverted U-shaped model: How frequent repetition affects perceived risk," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(3), pages 219-224, May.
    5. Jie Zhuang & Jeffrey G. Cox & Minwoong Chung & Joseph A. Hamm & Adam Zwickle & Brad L. Upham, 2019. "Risk, Stigma, Trustworthiness, and Citizen Participation—A Multifaceted Analysis of Media Coverage of Dioxin Contamination in Midland, Michigan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-15, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:13:y:2010:i:1:p:5-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.