IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jpropr/v24y2006i1p55-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Changing Importance of Sector and Regional Factors in Real Estate Returns: 1987--2002

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Lee
  • Steven Devaney

Abstract

A stylized fact in the real estate diversification literature is that sector (property type) effects are relatively more important than regional (geographical) factors in determining property returns. Thus, for those portfolio managers who follow a top‐down approach to portfolio management, they should first choose which sectors to invest in and then select the best properties in each market. However, the question arises as to whether the dominance of sector effects over regional effects is constant. If not, property fund managers will need to take account of regional effects in developing their portfolio strategy. Using monthly returns data for individual properties over the period 1987:1 to 2002:12, this paper investigates the influence of sector and regional factors on commercial real estate performance, first by adopting the dummy variable approach of Heston and Rouwenhorst (1994, 1995) and then by using the notion of cross‐sectional dispersion introduced by Solnik and Roulet (2000). The results show that sector‐specific dominate region‐specific factors for the majority of the time and, in particular, during volatile periods of the real estate cycle. However, during calmer periods, sector and regional effects appear to be of equal importance. Overall, sector effects are still the most important aspect in the development of an active portfolio strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Lee & Steven Devaney, 2006. "The Changing Importance of Sector and Regional Factors in Real Estate Returns: 1987--2002," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 55-69, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:24:y:2006:i:1:p:55-69
    DOI: 10.1080/09599910701297671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09599910701297671
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09599910701297671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Andrew & Steven Devaney & Stephen Lee, 2003. "Another Look at the Relative Importance of Sectors and Regions in Determining Property Returns," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2003-14, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Byrne & Stephen Lee, 2007. "Spatial Concentration in Institutional Investment in the UK: Some comparisons between the Retail and Office Sectors," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2007-01, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    2. Peter Byrne & Stephen Lee, 2006. "Geographical Concentration in the Institutional Market for Office Property in England and Wales," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2006-07, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    3. Steven Devaney, 2003. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Common Structures in Property Portfolio Construction," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2003-13, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    4. Steven Devaney & Stephen Lee, 2003. "Changes in the Relative Importance of Sector and Regional Factors: 1987-2002," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2003-16, Henley Business School, University of Reading.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:24:y:2006:i:1:p:55-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJPR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.