IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jpropr/v23y2006i1p75-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Economics and Policies for Changing Land Markets: The Case of Industrial Estates in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Barrie Needham
  • Erik Louw

Abstract

Public policies for land use include many rules and regulations. Changing those policies usually means changing rules. Institutional economics studies the effects of rules on economic behaviour and how of those rules change under economic forces. Therefore, economic theories of institutional change can be applied when designing new policies for land markets. This theoretical framework is applied to the policy followed in the Netherlands for industrial estates. This policy has been stable for approximately 60 years and shows little signs of change, even though some of its effects are not what the policy makers want. That continuity in the face of policy contradictions is explained here by economic theories of institutional change. They are applied here also to find practicable ways of changing the policy for industrial estates.

Suggested Citation

  • Barrie Needham & Erik Louw, 2006. "Institutional Economics and Policies for Changing Land Markets: The Case of Industrial Estates in the Netherlands," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 75-90, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:23:y:2006:i:1:p:75-90
    DOI: 10.1080/09599910600748675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09599910600748675
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09599910600748675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Yingjie & Lu, Bin & Wu, Jiayu, 2019. "Value capture in industrial land renewal under the public leasehold system: A policy comparison in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 59-69.
    2. Natacha Aveline-Dubach, 2014. "New Patterns of Property Investment in " Post-Bubble " Tokyo [Les nouvelles formes de l'investissement immobilier dans l'après-bulle à Tokyo]," Post-Print halshs-01242564, HAL.
    3. Le, Minh Khue & Zhu, Jieming & Nguyen, Hoang Linh, 2022. "Land redevelopment under ambiguous property rights in transitional Vietnam: A case of spatial transformation in Hanoi city center," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Or Levkovich & Jan Rouwendal, 2016. "Spatial Planning and Segmentation of the Land Market," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-018/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    5. Simon C. Y. Chen, 2011. "Common Interest Development and the Changing Roles of Government and Market in Planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(16), pages 3599-3612, December.
    6. Lee, Jongpyo & Jung, Sanghoon, 2020. "Industrial land use planning and the growth of knowledge industry: Location pattern of knowledge-intensive services and their determinants in the Seoul metropolitan area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Francois Viruly, 2009. "The Transformation of the South African Built Environment – An Institutional Approach LARES 2009, São Paulo, Brazil," LARES lares2009_295-rv, Latin American Real Estate Society (LARES).
    8. ., 2014. "Planning: reforms that might work and ones that won't," Chapters, in: Urban Economics and Urban Policy, chapter 6, pages 127-154, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. ., 2014. "Planning and economic performance," Chapters, in: Urban Economics and Urban Policy, chapter 5, pages 104-126, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:23:y:2006:i:1:p:75-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJPR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.