IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jpropr/v21y2004i2p119-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co‐operation with the community in property‐led urban regeneration

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Ball

Abstract

Community involvement is a requirement for the public sector funding of urban regeneration in the UK. As a result, it has a major effect on the governance of property‐led regeneration. How well has this new governance structure functioned? This question is addressed here through some deductions regarding the potential benefits and costs of community involvement. These highlight potential ambiguities in the nature of community involvement and difficulties in creating the appropriate conditions for successful co‐operation. This analysis is then compared with the results of a survey of the views on community representatives by non‐community participants in partnerships associated with property‐led urban regeneration. In general, the other partners found community representatives difficult to co‐operate with. Problems arose in particular over representativeness, trust and efficient working practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Ball, 2004. "Co‐operation with the community in property‐led urban regeneration," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 119-142, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:21:y:2004:i:2:p:119-142
    DOI: 10.1080/0959991042000328810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0959991042000328810
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0959991042000328810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Derek Walker & Yue Shen, 2002. "Project understanding, planning, flexibility of management action and construction time performance: two Australian case studies," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 31-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pourzakarya, Maryam & Bahramjerdi, Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad, 2021. "Community-led regeneration practice in Ghalam Gudeh District, Bandar Anzali, Iran: A participatory action research (PAR) Project," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Alex G. Miranda-Poggys & Marzia Morena, 2023. "A Critique on Public–Private–People Partnerships: From a Definitional Inconsistency to the Partnering Dilemma in Today’s Housing Conjunction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Nový & Jana Nováková & Miloš Waldhans, 2012. "Project management in building industry management," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(7), pages 189-198.
    2. Iyer K. Chandrashekhar & Banerjee Partha S., 2016. "Project ambidexterity: case of recovering schedule delay in a brownfield airport project in India," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1464-1481, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:21:y:2004:i:2:p:119-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJPR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.