Author
Listed:
- Andrew Baum
- Neil Crosby
- Sandi Murdoch
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to provide a response to suggestions that the removal of upward-only rent reviews (sometimes known as ratchet clauses) would reduce commercial property asset values in the UK. The paper also seeks to estimate the amount of the reduction. It argues that the fall in the capital value of commercial UK investment property will be a function of changes in risk/return characteristics which, when set within the framework of the current leasing structure and the expected cash flow determined thereby, manifests itself in changes in investment yields. Because the property market generates fewer transactions than some other capital markets, and because valuations are used as a surrogate for transactions when compiling property market data and indices, the way in which valuers approach investment property valuations in practice will also influence the perceived value loss caused by any change in legislation. This latter effect is modelled in this paper. The paper identifies the likely level of change in investment yields for the major UK commercial and industrial property types, examines the current leasing structure of those properties and investigates the current application of valuation techniques to these structures. This facilitates a valuation of the commercial and industrial property investment market, from which it is estimated that the effect on the value of UK property of the upward-only rent review clause being removed from future leases would be a reduction of 5% for offices, 4% for shops and 4% for industrials, a weighted average (using IPD weights) of 4.3% across all three sectors.
Suggested Citation
Andrew Baum & Neil Crosby & Sandi Murdoch, 1998.
"The contribution of upward-only rent reviews to the capital value of UK property,"
Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 105-120, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:15:y:1998:i:2:p:105-120
DOI: 10.1080/095999198368428
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jpropr:v:15:y:1998:i:2:p:105-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJPR20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.