IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jocebs/v22y2024i4p531-555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic thinking: the core of investment decision-making in Fund-of-Fund (FoF)

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Wang
  • Linzhi Tan
  • Yan Wang
  • Jessica Y. Wang

Abstract

This study investigates FoF managers’ investment decision-making process and the most important fund/fund manager attributes perceived by FoF managers. We find that FoF managers apply strategic thinking and actively seek out fund managers who also possess strategic thinking competencies. Our findings show that the determinants of fund performance identified in the existing literature (e.g. fund age and education background) play a complementary role at fund-level investment decision, whereas selecting fund managers with strategic thinking competencies (e.g. accumulated working experience, individual cognitive ability, personality, core value and personal beliefs) dominates the qualitative criteria in FoF managers’ thought processes. This study provides new empirical evidence from FoF managers, which sheds light on the challenges FoF managers face in the fund-level investment decisions. The comprehensive thematic framework of this study contributes to the investment decision-making literature and the findings of the study will be useful to practitioners while making investment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Wang & Linzhi Tan & Yan Wang & Jessica Y. Wang, 2024. "Strategic thinking: the core of investment decision-making in Fund-of-Fund (FoF)," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 531-555, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jocebs:v:22:y:2024:i:4:p:531-555
    DOI: 10.1080/14765284.2024.2388491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14765284.2024.2388491
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14765284.2024.2388491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jocebs:v:22:y:2024:i:4:p:531-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCEA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.