IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlbes/v42y2024i4p1289-1301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing for Equivalence of Pre-Trends in Difference-in-Differences Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Holger Dette
  • Martin Schumann

Abstract

The plausibility of the “parallel trends assumption” in Difference-in-Differences estimation is usually assessed by a test of the null hypothesis that the difference between the average outcomes of both groups is constant over time before the treatment. However, failure to reject the null hypothesis does not imply the absence of differences in time trends between both groups. We provide equivalence tests that allow researchers to find evidence in favor of the parallel trends assumption and thus increase the credibility of their treatment effect estimates. While we motivate our tests in the standard two-way fixed effects model, we discuss simple extensions to settings in which treatment adoption is staggered over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Holger Dette & Martin Schumann, 2024. "Testing for Equivalence of Pre-Trends in Difference-in-Differences Estimation," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 1289-1301, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlbes:v:42:y:2024:i:4:p:1289-1301
    DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2024.2308121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07350015.2024.2308121
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07350015.2024.2308121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlbes:v:42:y:2024:i:4:p:1289-1301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UBES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.