IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlbes/v42y2024i1p272-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probabilistic Forecast Reconciliation under the Gaussian Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Shanika L. Wickramasuriya

Abstract

Forecast reconciliation of multivariate time series maps a set of incoherent forecasts into coherent forecasts to satisfy a given set of linear constraints. Available methods in the literature either follow a projection matrix-based approach or an empirical copula-based reordering approach to revise the incoherent future sample paths to obtain reconciled probabilistic forecasts. The projection matrices are estimated either by optimizing a scoring rule such as energy or variogram score or simply using a projection matrix derived for point forecast reconciliation.This article proves that (a) if the incoherent predictive distribution is jointly Gaussian, then MinT (minimum trace) minimizes the logarithmic scoring rule for the hierarchy; and (b) the logarithmic score of MinT for each marginal predictive density is smaller than that of OLS (ordinary least squares). We illustrate these theoretical results using a set of simulation studies and the Australian domestic tourism dataset. The estimation of MinT needs to estimate the covariance matrix of the base forecast errors. We have evaluated the performance using the sample covariance matrix and shrinkage estimator. It was observed that the theoretical properties noted above are greatly impacted by the covariance matrix used and highlighted the importance of estimating it reliably, especially with high dimensional data.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanika L. Wickramasuriya, 2024. "Probabilistic Forecast Reconciliation under the Gaussian Framework," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 272-285, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlbes:v:42:y:2024:i:1:p:272-285
    DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2023.2181176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07350015.2023.2181176
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07350015.2023.2181176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlbes:v:42:y:2024:i:1:p:272-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UBES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.