Author
Listed:
- Liuqing Yang
- Yongdao Zhou
- Haoda Fu
- Min-Qian Liu
- Wei Zheng
Abstract
Shapley value is originally a concept in econometrics to fairly distribute both gains and costs to players in a coalition game. In the recent decades, its application has been extended to other areas such as marketing, engineering and machine learning. For example, it produces reasonable solutions for problems in sensitivity analysis, local model explanation toward the interpretable machine learning, node importance in social network, attribution models, etc. However, it could be very expensive to compute the Shapley value. Specifically, in a d-player coalition game, calculating a Shapley value requires the evaluation of d! or 2d marginal contribution values, depending on whether we are taking the permutation or combination formulation of the Shapley value. Hence, it becomes infeasible to calculate the Shapley value when d is reasonably large. A common remedy is to take a random sample of the permutations to surrogate for the complete list of permutations. We find an advanced sampling scheme can be designed to yield much more accurate estimation of the Shapley value than the simple random sampling (SRS). Our sampling scheme is based on combinatorial structures in the field of design of experiments (DOE), particularly the order-of-addition experimental designs for the study of how the orderings of components would affect the output. We show that the obtained estimates are unbiased, and can sometimes deterministically recover the original Shapley value. Both theoretical and simulations results show that our DOE-based sampling scheme outperforms SRS in terms of estimation accuracy. Surprisingly, it is also slightly faster than SRS. Lastly, real data analysis is conducted for the C. elegans nervous system and the 9/11 terrorist network. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Suggested Citation
Liuqing Yang & Yongdao Zhou & Haoda Fu & Min-Qian Liu & Wei Zheng, 2024.
"Fast Approximation of the Shapley Values Based on Order-of-Addition Experimental Designs,"
Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(547), pages 2294-2304, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:119:y:2024:i:547:p:2294-2304
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2023.2257364
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:119:y:2024:i:547:p:2294-2304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.