IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v119y2024i547p2026-2037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity to Unobserved Confounding in Studies with Factor-Structured Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Jiajing Zheng
  • Jiaxi Wu
  • Alexander D’Amour
  • Alexander Franks

Abstract

In this work, we propose an approach for assessing sensitivity to unobserved confounding in studies with multiple outcomes. We demonstrate how prior knowledge unique to the multi-outcome setting can be leveraged to strengthen causal conclusions beyond what can be achieved from analyzing individual outcomes in isolation. We argue that it is often reasonable to make a shared confounding assumption, under which residual dependence amongst outcomes can be used to simplify and sharpen sensitivity analyses. We focus on a class of factor models for which we can bound the causal effects for all outcomes conditional on a single sensitivity parameter that represents the fraction of treatment variance explained by unobserved confounders. We characterize how causal ignorance regions shrink under additional prior assumptions about the presence of null control outcomes, and provide new approaches for quantifying the robustness of causal effect estimates. Finally, we illustrate our sensitivity analysis workflow in practice, in an analysis of both simulated data and a case study with data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiajing Zheng & Jiaxi Wu & Alexander D’Amour & Alexander Franks, 2024. "Sensitivity to Unobserved Confounding in Studies with Factor-Structured Outcomes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(547), pages 2026-2037, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:119:y:2024:i:547:p:2026-2037
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2023.2240053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2023.2240053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2023.2240053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:119:y:2024:i:547:p:2026-2037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.