IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v119y2024i546p1396-1408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Test of Significance for High-Dimensional Thresholds with Application to Individualized Minimal Clinically Important Difference

Author

Listed:
  • Huijie Feng
  • Jingyi Duan
  • Yang Ning
  • Jiwei Zhao

Abstract

This work is motivated by learning the individualized minimal clinically important difference, a vital concept to assess clinical importance in various biomedical studies. We formulate the scientific question into a high-dimensional statistical problem where the parameter of interest lies in an individualized linear threshold. The goal is to develop a hypothesis testing procedure for the significance of a single element in this parameter as well as of a linear combination of this parameter. The difficulty dues to the high-dimensional nuisance in developing such a testing procedure, and also stems from the fact that this high-dimensional threshold model is nonregular and the limiting distribution of the corresponding estimator is nonstandard. To deal with these challenges, we construct a test statistic via a new bias-corrected smoothed decorrelated score approach, and establish its asymptotic distributions under both null and local alternative hypotheses. We propose a double-smoothing approach to select the optimal bandwidth in our test statistic and provide theoretical guarantees for the selected bandwidth. We conduct simulation studies to demonstrate how our proposed procedure can be applied in empirical studies. We apply the proposed method to a clinical trial where the scientific goal is to assess the clinical importance of a surgery procedure. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Huijie Feng & Jingyi Duan & Yang Ning & Jiwei Zhao, 2024. "Test of Significance for High-Dimensional Thresholds with Application to Individualized Minimal Clinically Important Difference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(546), pages 1396-1408, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:119:y:2024:i:546:p:1396-1408
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2023.2195977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2023.2195977
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2023.2195977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:119:y:2024:i:546:p:1396-1408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.