IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v119y2024i546p1229-1239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hypotheses Testing from Complex Survey Data Using Bootstrap Weights: A Unified Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jae Kwang Kim
  • J. N. K. Rao
  • Zhonglei Wang

Abstract

Standard statistical methods without taking proper account of the complexity of a survey design can lead to erroneous inferences when applied to survey data due to unequal selection probabilities, clustering, and other design features. In particular, the Type I error rates of hypotheses tests using standard methods can be much larger than the nominal significance level. Methods incorporating design features in testing hypotheses have been proposed, including Wald tests and quasi-score tests that involve estimated covariance matrices of parameter estimates. In this article, we present a unified approach to hypothesis testing without requiring estimated covariance matrices or design effects, by constructing bootstrap approximations to quasi-likelihood ratio statistics and quasi-score statistics and establishing its asymptotic validity. The proposed method can be easily implemented without a specific software designed for complex survey sampling. We also consider hypothesis testing for categorical data and present a bootstrap procedure for testing simple goodness of fit and independence in a two-way table. In simulation studies, the Type I error rates of the proposed approach are much closer to their nominal significance level compared with the naive likelihood ratio test and quasi-score test. An application to an educational survey under a logistic regression model is also presented. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Jae Kwang Kim & J. N. K. Rao & Zhonglei Wang, 2024. "Hypotheses Testing from Complex Survey Data Using Bootstrap Weights: A Unified Approach," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(546), pages 1229-1239, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:119:y:2024:i:546:p:1229-1239
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2023.2183130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2023.2183130
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2023.2183130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:119:y:2024:i:546:p:1229-1239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.