IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v118y2023i541p761-773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential Privacy for Government Agencies—Are We There Yet?

Author

Listed:
  • Jörg Drechsler

Abstract

Government agencies typically need to take potential risks of disclosure into account whenever they publish statistics based on their data or give external researchers access to collected data. In this context, the promise of formal privacy guarantees offered by concepts such as differential privacy seems to be the panacea enabling the agencies to quantify and control the privacy loss incurred by any data release exactly. Nevertheless, despite the excitement in academia and industry, most agencies—with the prominent exception of the U.S. Census Bureau—have been reluctant to even consider the concept for their data release strategy. This article discusses potential reasons for this. We argue that the requirements for implementing differential privacy approaches at government agencies are often fundamentally different from the requirements in industry. This raises many challenges and questions that still need to be addressed before the concept can be used as an overarching principle when sharing data with the public. The article does not offer any solutions to these challenges. Instead, we hope to stimulate some collaborative research efforts, as we believe that many of the problems can only be addressed by interdisciplinary collaborations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jörg Drechsler, 2023. "Differential Privacy for Government Agencies—Are We There Yet?," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 118(541), pages 761-773, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:118:y:2023:i:541:p:761-773
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2022.2161385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2022.2161385
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2022.2161385?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karl van der Schyff & Greg Foster & Karen Renaud & Stephen Flowerday, 2023. "Online Privacy Fatigue: A Scoping Review and Research Agenda," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-31, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:118:y:2023:i:541:p:761-773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.