IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v117y2022i540p1605-1621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variation and Covariation in Large-Scale Replication Projects: An Evaluation of Replicability

Author

Listed:
  • Blakeley B. McShane
  • Ulf Böckenholt
  • Karsten T. Hansen

Abstract

Over the last decade, large-scale replication projects across the biomedical and social sciences have reported relatively low replication rates. In these large-scale replication projects, replication has typically been evaluated based on a single replication study of some original study and dichotomously as successful or failed. However, evaluations of replicability that are based on a single study and are dichotomous are inadequate, and evaluations of replicability should instead be based on multiple studies, be continuous, and be multi-faceted. Further, such evaluations are in fact possible due to two characteristics shared by many large-scale replication projects. In this article, we provide such an evaluation for two prominent large-scale replication projects, one which replicated a phenomenon from cognitive psychology and another which replicated 13 phenomena from social psychology and behavioral economics. Our results indicate a very high degree of replicability in the former and a medium to low degree of replicability in the latter. They also suggest an unidentified covariate in each, namely ocular dominance in the former and political ideology in the latter, that is theoretically pertinent. We conclude by discussing evaluations of replicability at large, recommendations for future large-scale replication projects, and design-based model generalization. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Blakeley B. McShane & Ulf Böckenholt & Karsten T. Hansen, 2022. "Variation and Covariation in Large-Scale Replication Projects: An Evaluation of Replicability," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 117(540), pages 1605-1621, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:117:y:2022:i:540:p:1605-1621
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2022.2054816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2022.2054816
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2022.2054816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Boeck & Michael L. DeKay & Jolynn Pek, 2024. "Adventitious Error and Its Implications for Testing Relations Between Variables and for Composite Measurement Outcomes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(3), pages 1055-1073, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:117:y:2022:i:540:p:1605-1621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.