Author
Listed:
- Lazhi Wang
- David E. Jones
- Xiao-Li Meng
Abstract
Bridge sampling is an effective Monte Carlo (MC) method for estimating the ratio of normalizing constants of two probability densities, a routine computational problem in statistics, physics, chemistry, and other fields. The MC error of the bridge sampling estimator is determined by the amount of overlap between the two densities. In the case of unimodal densities, Warp-I, II, and III transformations are effective for increasing the initial overlap, but they are less so for multimodal densities. This article introduces Warp-U transformations that aim to transform multimodal densities into unimodal ones (hence “U”) without altering their normalizing constants. The construction of a Warp-U transformation starts with a normal (or other convenient) mixture distribution ϕmix that has reasonable overlap with the target density p, whose normalizing constant is unknown. The stochastic transformation that maps ϕmix back to its generating distribution N(0,1) is then applied to p yielding its Warp-U version, which we denote p˜ . Typically, p˜ is unimodal and has substantially increased overlap with ϕ . Furthermore, we prove that the overlap between p˜ and N(0,1) is guaranteed to be no less than the overlap between p and ϕmix , in terms of any f-divergence. We propose a computationally efficient method to find an appropriate ϕmix , and a simple but effective approach to remove the bias which results from estimating the normalizing constant and fitting ϕmix with the same data. We illustrate our findings using 10 and 50 dimensional highly irregular multimodal densities, and demonstrate how Warp-U sampling can be used to improve the final estimation step of the Generalized Wang–Landau algorithm, a powerful sampling and estimation approach. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Suggested Citation
Lazhi Wang & David E. Jones & Xiao-Li Meng, 2022.
"Warp Bridge Sampling: The Next Generation,"
Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 117(538), pages 835-851, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:117:y:2022:i:538:p:835-851
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1825447
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:117:y:2022:i:538:p:835-851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.