Author
Abstract
Cancers arise owing to somatic mutations, and the characteristic combinations of somatic mutations form mutational signatures. Despite many mutational signatures being identified, mutational processes underlying a number of mutational signatures remain unknown, which hinders the identification of interventions that may reduce somatic mutation burdens and prevent the development of cancer. We demonstrate that the unknown cause of a mutational signature can be inferred by the associated signatures with known etiology. However, existing association tests are not statistically powerful due to excess zeros in mutational signatures data. To address this limitation, we propose a semiparametric kernel independence test (SKIT). The SKIT statistic is defined as the integrated squared distance between mixed probability distributions and is decomposed into four disjoint components to pinpoint the source of dependency. We derive the asymptotic null distribution and prove the asymptotic convergence of power. Due to slow convergence to the asymptotic null distribution, a bootstrap method is employed to compute p-values. Simulation studies demonstrate that when zeros are prevalent, SKIT is more resilient to power loss than existing tests and robust to random errors. We applied SKIT to The Cancer Genome Atlas mutational signatures data for over 9000 tumors across 32 cancer types, and identified a novel association between signature 17 curated in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer and apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme (APOBEC) signatures in gastrointestinal cancers. It indicates that APOBEC activity is likely associated with the unknown cause of signature 17. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.
Suggested Citation
DongHyuk Lee & Bin Zhu, 2021.
"A Semiparametric Kernel Independence Test With Application to Mutational Signatures,"
Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(536), pages 1648-1661, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:116:y:2021:i:536:p:1648-1661
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1871357
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:116:y:2021:i:536:p:1648-1661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.