Author
Listed:
- Naim U. Rashid
- Daniel J. Luckett
- Jingxiang Chen
- Michael T. Lawson
- Longshaokan Wang
- Yunshu Zhang
- Eric B. Laber
- Yufeng Liu
- Jen Jen Yeh
- Donglin Zeng
- Michael R. Kosorok
Abstract
The complexity of human cancer often results in significant heterogeneity in response to treatment. Precision medicine offers the potential to improve patient outcomes by leveraging this heterogeneity. Individualized treatment rules (ITRs) formalize precision medicine as maps from the patient covariate space into the space of allowable treatments. The optimal ITR is that which maximizes the mean of a clinical outcome in a population of interest. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) studies permit the evaluation of multiple treatments within a single tumor, and thus are ideally suited for estimating optimal ITRs. PDX data are characterized by correlated outcomes, a high-dimensional feature space, and a large number of treatments. Here we explore machine learning methods for estimating optimal ITRs from PDX data. We analyze data from a large PDX study to identify biomarkers that are informative for developing personalized treatment recommendations in multiple cancers. We estimate optimal ITRs using regression-based (Q-learning) and direct-search methods (outcome weighted learning). Finally, we implement a superlearner approach to combine multiple estimated ITRs and show that the resulting ITR performs better than any of the input ITRs, mitigating uncertainty regarding user choice. Our results indicate that PDX data are a valuable resource for developing individualized treatment strategies in oncology. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Suggested Citation
Naim U. Rashid & Daniel J. Luckett & Jingxiang Chen & Michael T. Lawson & Longshaokan Wang & Yunshu Zhang & Eric B. Laber & Yufeng Liu & Jen Jen Yeh & Donglin Zeng & Michael R. Kosorok, 2020.
"High-Dimensional Precision Medicine From Patient-Derived Xenografts,"
Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(535), pages 1140-1154, November.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:116:y:2020:i:535:p:1140-1154
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1828091
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:116:y:2020:i:535:p:1140-1154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.