IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v111y2016i514p538-548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint Estimation of Treatment and Placebo Effects in Clinical Trials With Longitudinal Blinding Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Liu
  • Zhiwei Zhang
  • R. Jason Schroeder
  • Martin Ho
  • Bo Zhang
  • Cynthia Long
  • Hui Zhang
  • Telba Z. Irony

Abstract

In some therapeutic areas, treatment evaluation is frequently complicated by a possible placebo effect (i.e., the psychobiological effect of a patient's knowledge or belief of being treated). When a substantial placebo effect is likely to exist, it is important to distinguish the treatment and placebo effects in quantifying the clinical benefit of a new treatment. These causal effects can be formally defined in a joint causal model that includes treatment (e.g., new vs. placebo) and treatmentality (i.e., a patient's belief or mentality about which treatment she or he has received) as separate exposures. Information about the treatmentality exposure can be obtained from blinding assessments, which are increasingly common in clinical trials where blinding success is in question. Assuming that treatmentality has a lagged effect and is measured at multiple time points, this article is concerned with joint evaluation of treatment and placebo effects in clinical trials with longitudinal follow-up, possibly with monotone missing data. We describe and discuss several methods adapted from the longitudinal causal inference literature, apply them to a weight loss study, and compare them in simulation experiments that mimic the weight loss study. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Liu & Zhiwei Zhang & R. Jason Schroeder & Martin Ho & Bo Zhang & Cynthia Long & Hui Zhang & Telba Z. Irony, 2016. "Joint Estimation of Treatment and Placebo Effects in Clinical Trials With Longitudinal Blinding Assessments," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 538-548, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:111:y:2016:i:514:p:538-548
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1130633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2015.1130633
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2015.1130633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:111:y:2016:i:514:p:538-548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.