IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v110y2015i512p1717-1725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Asymptotic Distributions and Confidence Intervals for LIFT Measures in Data Mining

Author

Listed:
  • Wenxin Jiang
  • Yu Zhao

Abstract

A LIFT measure, such as the response rate, lift, or the percentage of captured response, is a fundamental measure of effectiveness for a scoring rule obtained from data mining, which is estimated from a set of validation data. In this article, we study how to construct confidence intervals of the LIFT measures. We point out the subtlety of this task and explain how simple binomial confidence intervals can have incorrect coverage probabilities, due to omitting variation from the sample percentile of the scoring rule. We derive the asymptotic distribution using some advanced empirical process theory and the functional delta method in the Appendix. The additional variation is shown to be related to a conditional mean response, which can be estimated by a local averaging of the responses over the scores from the validation data. Alternatively, a subsampling method is shown to provide a valid confidence interval, without needing to estimate the conditional mean response. Numerical experiments are conducted to compare these different methods regarding the coverage probabilities and the lengths of the resulting confidence intervals.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenxin Jiang & Yu Zhao, 2015. "On Asymptotic Distributions and Confidence Intervals for LIFT Measures in Data Mining," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1717-1725, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:110:y:2015:i:512:p:1717-1725
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2014.993080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2014.993080
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2014.993080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:110:y:2015:i:512:p:1717-1725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.