IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v107y2012i500p1492-1501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landmark Prediction of Long-Term Survival Incorporating Short-Term Event Time Information

Author

Listed:
  • Layla Parast
  • Su-Chun Cheng
  • Tianxi Cai

Abstract

In recent years, a wide range of markers have become available as potential tools to predict risk or progression of disease. In addition to such biological and genetic markers, short-term outcome information may be useful in predicting long-term disease outcomes. When such information is available, it would be desirable to combine this along with predictive markers to improve the prediction of long-term survival. Most existing methods for incorporating censored short-term event information in predicting long-term survival focus on modeling the disease process and are derived under restrictive parametric models in a multistate survival setting. When such model assumptions fail to hold, the resulting prediction of long-term outcomes may be invalid or inaccurate. When there is only a single discrete baseline covariate, a fully nonparametric estimation procedure to incorporate short-term event time information has been previously proposed. However, such an approach is not feasible for settings with one or more continuous covariates due to the curse of dimensionality. In this article, we propose to incorporate short-term event time information along with multiple covariates collected up to a landmark point via a flexible varying-coefficient model. To evaluate and compare the prediction performance of the resulting landmark prediction rule, we use robust nonparametric procedures that do not require the correct specification of the proposed varying-coefficient model. Simulation studies suggest that the proposed procedures perform well in finite samples. We illustrate them here using a dataset of postdialysis patients with end-stage renal disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Layla Parast & Su-Chun Cheng & Tianxi Cai, 2012. "Landmark Prediction of Long-Term Survival Incorporating Short-Term Event Time Information," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(500), pages 1492-1501, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:500:p:1492-1501
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2012.721281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2012.721281
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2012.721281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Layla Parast & Carolyn M. Rutter, 2017. "Discussion of “A risk-based measure of time-varying prognostic discrimination for survival models,” by C. Jason Liang and Patrick J. Heagerty," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 742-744, September.
    2. Liang Li & Sheng Luo & Bo Hu & Tom Greene, 2017. "Dynamic Prediction of Renal Failure Using Longitudinal Biomarkers in a Cohort Study of Chronic Kidney Disease," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 9(2), pages 357-378, December.
    3. Layla Parast & Lu Tian & Tianxi Cai, 2014. "Landmark Estimation of Survival and Treatment Effect in a Randomized Clinical Trial," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(505), pages 384-394, March.
    4. Paul Blanche & Cécile Proust-Lima & Lucie Loubère & Claudine Berr & Jean-François Dartigues & Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda, 2015. "Quantifying and comparing dynamic predictive accuracy of joint models for longitudinal marker and time-to-event in presence of censoring and competing risks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 102-113, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:107:y:2012:i:500:p:1492-1501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.