IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jitecd/v33y2024i4p694-722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Terrorist attacks, security concerns, and GVC positions – an empirical cross-country study based on industry heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Zixuan Zhou
  • Kun Liu

Abstract

Based on the perspective of industry productivity, this article measures the sensitivities of different industries to external public security risks using stochastic frontier analysis, focusing on the relationship between the changes in industries’ production line positions triggered by terrorist attacks and the industries’ security risk sensitivities. We provide evidence that terrorist attacks have a significant adverse impact on the production line positions of global industries, and the strength of those positions’ reactions to terrorist attacks is determined by the degree of the industries’ security risk sensitivities. The reactions to terrorist attacks are nonmonotonic across industries’ security risk sensitivities, with the largest effects in industries near the seventy-fifth percentile of the distribution. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced in high-income and upper-middle-income countries, and also in regions with economic and trade cooperation agreements. A further decomposition analysis of the different production stages shows that complex global value chain (GVC) activities, especially those that involve domestic value-added re-exports to third countries, are more vulnerable to negative shocks from terrorist attacks.

Suggested Citation

  • Zixuan Zhou & Kun Liu, 2024. "Terrorist attacks, security concerns, and GVC positions – an empirical cross-country study based on industry heterogeneity," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 694-722, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jitecd:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:694-722
    DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2023.2222417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638199.2023.2222417
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638199.2023.2222417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jitecd:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:694-722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJTE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.