IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jitecd/v30y2021i7p1077-1100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does institutional quality matter for export product quality? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yumei Lin
  • Shanlang Lin
  • Xiaowan Wang
  • Jian Wu

Abstract

In this study, we discuss institutional quality and export product quality within a unified framework and explore the influence of institutional quality on product export quality empirically by matching regional-level data, Chinese Industrial Enterprises Database and the China Customs Import and Export Database in the period of 2000–2011. To reflect institutional quality as comprehensively as possible, we construct an index system including six institutional factors: financial service, open-door, government intervention, corruption, property rights protection and judicial fairness. To avoid the loss of information and minimize the endogeneity of reverse causality, we take advantage of microdata of enterprise in regression. The results show that, on average, the improvement of institutional quality has a positive impact on export product quality; Compared with processing trade, export product quality of general trading enterprises is more affected by local institutional quality. Among the various factors of institutional quality, corruption and judicial fairness have the greatest impact on export product quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Yumei Lin & Shanlang Lin & Xiaowan Wang & Jian Wu, 2021. "Does institutional quality matter for export product quality? Evidence from China," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 1077-1100, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jitecd:v:30:y:2021:i:7:p:1077-1100
    DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2021.1936133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638199.2021.1936133
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638199.2021.1936133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dreier, Silas & Liu, Wan-hsin, 2023. "Technological sophistication made in China? New insights from Germany's evaluation of COVID-19 antigen rapid tests," Kiel Working Papers 2261, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Wenni Lei & Yuwei Luo, 2022. "Institutions Rule in Export Diversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Ding Nan & Pomi Shahbaz & Shamsheer ul Haq & Muhammad Nadeem & Muhammad Imran, 2023. "The Economies’ Ability to Produce Diversified and Complex Goods to Meet the Global Competition: Role of Gross Value Chain, Institutional Quality, and Human Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Silas Dreier & Wan-Hsin Liu, 2023. "Technological sophistication made in China? – New insights from Germany's evaluation of COVID-19 antigen rapid tests," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 43(4), pages 1555-1564.
    5. Iftikhar Ahmad & Arifa Saeed & Asad Ejaz Sheikh & Seyab Yasin, 2024. "The Impact of Financial Development, Net Foreign Assets and Domestic Businesses on Export Performance: A case of Singapore Economy," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 712-718.
    6. Wei Qiu & Yinghua Li & Haitao Wu, 2023. "The role of direct financing on regional green development: inhibition or promotion?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3665-3699, October.
    7. Dreier, Silas & Liu, Wan-hsin, 2023. "Technological sophistication made in China? New insights from Germany's evaluation of COVID-19 antigen rapid tests," KCG Working Papers 30, Kiel Centre for Globalization (KCG).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jitecd:v:30:y:2021:i:7:p:1077-1100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJTE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.