IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jhudca/v12y2011i4p469-491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Governance and Human Development: Promoting Democratic Accountability and Institutional Experimentation

Author

Listed:
  • Arjun Jayadev

Abstract

This paper identifies two elements for global governance critical to the pursuit of human development: democratic accountability and institutional experimentation. The paper stresses the critical importance of organizing effective global institutions for the purpose of human development and briefly discusses some major challenges that can and do affect the international community. It summarizes the theoretical underpinnings for the primacy of institutions as derived from two strands of development theory and the extent towards which these ideas have been acted upon in developing frameworks of global governance. The paper discusses these two principles in light of some of the major challenges that can and do affect the international community as a whole, and some of the decentralized forms of governance that are being developed as developing countries assert themselves in debates on institutional organization. It focuses on the global financial crisis as a case study in the inadequacies of current global governance and the reforms advocated by the Commission of Experts of the President of the United Nations General Assembly on Reforms of the International Monetary and Financial System to redress these failures.

Suggested Citation

  • Arjun Jayadev, 2011. "Global Governance and Human Development: Promoting Democratic Accountability and Institutional Experimentation," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 469-491, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:12:y:2011:i:4:p:469-491
    DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2011.610781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19452829.2011.610781
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19452829.2011.610781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto Mangabeira Unger, 2007. "Free Trade Reimagined: The World Division of Labor and the Method of Economics," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 8473.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eduardo Medeiros, 2021. "The Global Development Formula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leppälä, Samuli & Desrochers, Pierre, 2010. "The division of labor need not imply regional specialization," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-2), pages 137-147, May.
    2. Pierre Desrochers & Frederic Sautet, 2008. "Entrepreneurial Policy: The Case of Regional Specialization vs. Spontaneous Industrial Diversity," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(5), pages 813-832, September.
    3. Matjaz Nahtigal, 2013. "Rethinking Modern European Industrial Policy: Beyond the Current EU Legal Framework," MIC 2013: Industry, Science and Policy Makers for Sustainable Future; Proceedings of the 14th International Conference, Koper, 21–23 November 2013 [Selected Papers],, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    4. Matjaz Nahtigal, 2014. "Toward Modern European Industrial Policy," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 12(2 (Summer), pages 179-194.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:12:y:2011:i:4:p:469-491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJHD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.