IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jgsmks/v24y2014i4p411-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A decision model development for crowdsourcing in the fashion industry

Author

Listed:
  • Eunha Chun
  • Sangah Song
  • Eunju Ko

Abstract

Crowdsourcing is emerging as a tactic for the fashion industry to better integrate customers' needs and quickly react to the industry's rapidly changing environment. This is a visible shift from the past focus on a designer's know-how based on individual experience and creativity.Yet there is a lack of academic research on the use of crowdsourcing in the fashion industry. How can crowdsourcing go through a methodological evaluation process? What specific criteria are important for fashion companies to evaluate designs based on objective parameters? The purposes of this study are: (1) to generate an evaluation standard for a crowdsourced fashion design, and (2) to build an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) decision model for making final design selections. Two methods are used to produce the robustness of a decision model: taxonomic analysis and AHP. This study reveals that the most important evaluation factors are brand suitability, design excellence, production efficiency, marketing effect, and additional management considerations. Another important feature is the paper's attempt to evaluate a design, a strategic asset of any fashion brand, by approaching the subject with a systematic, scientific method.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunha Chun & Sangah Song & Eunju Ko, 2014. "A decision model development for crowdsourcing in the fashion industry," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 411-425, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:24:y:2014:i:4:p:411-425
    DOI: 10.1080/21639159.2014.949366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21639159.2014.949366
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21639159.2014.949366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chesbrough, Henry & Vanhaverbeke, Wim & West, Joel (ed.), 2008. "Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199226467.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mirza A. Haq, Salman Abbasi, 2016. "Indirect Impact of Hedonic Consumption and Emotions on Impulse Purchase Behavior: A Double Mediation Model," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 3(2), pages 108-122, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Najda-Janoszka, Marta, 2011. "Zatrzymywanie Wartości W Sieciach Kooperacyjnych Przedsiębiorstw [Value Appropriation in Cooperative Networks]," MPRA Paper 42582, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Maxim Kotsemir & Alexander Abroskin & Dirk Meissner, 2013. "Innovation concepts and typology – an evolutionary discussion," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Aurel Burciu & Rozalia Kicsi & Simona Buta & Mihaela State & Iulia Burlac & Denisa Alexandra Chifan & Beatrice Ipsalat, 2023. "The Study of the Relationship among GCI, GII, Disruptive Technology, and Social Innovations in MNCs: How Do We Evaluate Financial Innovations Made by Firms? A Preliminary Inquiry," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-42, August.
    4. Lyudmila Nikolaevna Perepechko & Galina Yakovlevna Belyakova, 2018. "The Interconnection among Science, Industry, State, and Society in Russia," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 34(4), pages 425-443, December.
    5. Seo, Ribin & Park, Ji-Hoon, 2022. "When is interorganizational learning beneficial for inbound open innovation of ventures? A contingent role of entrepreneurial orientation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Tan, Wee-Liang & Zuckermann, Ghil'ad, 2021. "External impetus, co-production and grassroots innovations: The case of an innovation involving a language," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    7. Agata Sudolska & Andrzej Lis, 2014. "Building a Model of Successful Collaborative Learning for Company Innovativeness," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 10(3), pages 109-137.
    8. Kokshagina, Olga & Le Masson, Pascal & Bories, Florent, 2017. "Fast-connecting search practices: On the role of open innovation intermediary to accelerate the absorptive capacity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 232-239.
    9. Archibugi, Daniele & Filippetti, Andrea, 2018. "The retreat of public research and its adverse consequences on innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 97-111.
    10. Imed Boughzala & Saïd Assar & Thierry Isckia, 2011. "Étude exploratoire sur les perspectives d'évolution de l'e-gouvernement à l'ère de l'innovation ouverte et du Web 2.0," Post-Print hal-02414253, HAL.
    11. Shuk Ying Ho & Arun Rai, 2017. "Continued Voluntary Participation Intention in Firm-Participating Open Source Software Projects," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 603-625, September.
    12. Jose-Luis Retolaza & Leire San-Jose & Maite Ruiz-Roqueñi, 2014. "Ontological Stakeholder View: An Innovative Proposition," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(1), pages 25-36, March.
    13. Yutao Sun & Chen Zhang & Robert A. W. Kok, 2020. "The role of research outcome quality in the relationship between university research collaboration and technology transfer: empirical results from China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(2), pages 1003-1026, February.
    14. Daniele Archibugi & Andrea Filippetti, 2016. "(English) The Retreat of Public Research and its Adverse Consequences on Innovation (Italiano) I cambiamenti nella ricerca pubblica e le conseguenze avverse sull’innovazione," IRPPS Working Papers 94:2016, National Research Council, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies.
    15. Beata Poteralska, 2021. "Support for the Development of Technological Innovations at an R&D Organisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    16. Jari Stenvall & Petri Virtanen, 2017. "Intelligent Public Organisations," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 195-209, June.
    17. Sophie Hooge & Olga Kokshagina & Pascal Le Masson & Kevin Levillain & Benoit Weil & Vincent Fabreguettes & Nathalie Popiolek, 2014. "Designing generic technologies in Energy Research: learning from two CEA technologies for double unknown management," Post-Print hal-00987214, HAL.
    18. Lenart-Gansiniec, Regina, 2016. "Importance Of Crowdsourcing In Social Innovations: Evidence From Poland," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 4(3), pages 1-12.
    19. Zhelyu Vladimirov, 2021. "Mediating Role of Innovations as a Factor of Firm’s Competitiveness," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 407-429, September.
    20. Daron Acemoglu & Mohamed Mostagir & Asuman Ozdaglar, 2014. "Managing Innovation in a Crowd," NBER Working Papers 19852, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:24:y:2014:i:4:p:411-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RGAM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.