IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v68y2025i5p1105-1127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring social justice in marine spatial planning: planner and stakeholder perspectives and experiences in the Baltic Sea Region

Author

Listed:
  • Ignė Stalmokaitė
  • Ralph Tafon
  • Fred Saunders
  • Kira Gee
  • Michael Gilek
  • Aurelija Armoškaitė
  • Anda Ikauniece
  • Magdalena Matczak
  • Jakub Turski
  • Jacek Zaucha

Abstract

This article contributes to the increasing traction of social justice in marine spatial planning (MSP) by exploring perceptions and experiences of social justice from the viewpoint of planners and different social groups who were included and (self)excluded in MSP processes. The study builds on empirical material from Poland, Latvia, and Germany consisting of interviews, MSP legislation, and documents that were analysed through the lens of a multidimensional social justice framework centring on recognition, representation, distribution, and capabilities. Results indicate that MSP institutional arrangements constrain possibilities for marginalised and less consolidated actor groups (residents, coastal tourism, and small-scale fisheries) to enjoy the same degree of recognition that is given to groups representing strategic national interests (renewable energy and shipping). We also highlight the role of planners’ self-reflectivity in enhancing/depriving capabilities of vulnerable social groups whose wellbeing and multidimensional relationships with the sea call for institutional responses adaptive to specific planning contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ignė Stalmokaitė & Ralph Tafon & Fred Saunders & Kira Gee & Michael Gilek & Aurelija Armoškaitė & Anda Ikauniece & Magdalena Matczak & Jakub Turski & Jacek Zaucha, 2025. "Exploring social justice in marine spatial planning: planner and stakeholder perspectives and experiences in the Baltic Sea Region," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(5), pages 1105-1127, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:68:y:2025:i:5:p:1105-1127
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2023.2279512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2023.2279512
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2023.2279512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:68:y:2025:i:5:p:1105-1127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.