IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v68y2025i5p1082-1104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Un)managed retreat? Perspectives on biophysical and social dynamics of coastal retreat on O‘ahu, Hawai‘i

Author

Listed:
  • Makena Coffman
  • Leah Bremer
  • Alisha Summers
  • Conrad Newfield
  • Lisa C. Kelley

Abstract

As an island community with world famous beaches, Hawai‘i’s coastal managers face significant challenges in the face of sea level rise (SLR). Shoreline laws have recently been updated to limit further shoreline hardening, making Hawaiʻi a salient case study to understand the challenges and opportunities around managed retreat. We interviewed 42 private sector, civil society, and government actors involved with coastal governance and anchored our conversations to three distinct communities on O‘ahu. Factors that affected participant perspectives on the viability of retreat per site hinged on: 1) physical/natural barriers and opportunities; 2) perceptions of the public value of a beach; 3) the importance of existing infrastructure; and 4) the political influence of coastal homeowners. Participants’ views on who should inform the coastal planning process moving forward varied by site. In addition to residents, there was largely agreement that communities should include those with affinity and long-standing relationships with place.

Suggested Citation

  • Makena Coffman & Leah Bremer & Alisha Summers & Conrad Newfield & Lisa C. Kelley, 2025. "(Un)managed retreat? Perspectives on biophysical and social dynamics of coastal retreat on O‘ahu, Hawai‘i," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(5), pages 1082-1104, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:68:y:2025:i:5:p:1082-1104
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2023.2279019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2023.2279019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2023.2279019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:68:y:2025:i:5:p:1082-1104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.