IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v67y2024i9p1998-2016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How justice shapes transition governance – a discourse analysis of Swedish policy debates

Author

Listed:
  • Anke Fischer
  • Sofie Joosse
  • Jacob Strandell
  • Nora Söderberg
  • Kornelia Johansson
  • Wiebren Johannes Boonstra

Abstract

In both policy-making and academia, the realisation is growing that transitions striving for sustainability have to be just to be socially accepted. This insight has given rise to institutionalised approaches to a “just transition” – but also beyond these, justice is a key challenge in the governance of sustainability transitions. In this paper, we examine how justice arguments are being used in national-level discourses of transition governance in Sweden. Analysing 121 policy-related documents from 2019 to 2021, we found that justice was discursively treated in a way that essentially stifled change. Political actors attempted to trump each other’s justice claims rather than to genuinely engage with them. Justice concerns that would not serve re-election, such as solidarity across social boundaries, were almost absent from the material. Based on these findings, we critically explore how justice arguments contribute to politicizing transition governance in particular ways, rendering some policy options impossible.

Suggested Citation

  • Anke Fischer & Sofie Joosse & Jacob Strandell & Nora Söderberg & Kornelia Johansson & Wiebren Johannes Boonstra, 2024. "How justice shapes transition governance – a discourse analysis of Swedish policy debates," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(9), pages 1998-2016, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:9:p:1998-2016
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2023.2177842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2023.2177842
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2023.2177842?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:9:p:1998-2016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.