IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v67y2024i6p1280-1302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing development and forest conservation: the impact of Maryland’s Forest Conservation Act on spatial configuration of forest and housing

Author

Listed:
  • Miranda H. Mockrin
  • David A. Newburn
  • John S. Stanovick

Abstract

We use a unique dataset of land parcels and forest cover, before and after subdivision development, to examine outcomes of Maryland’s Forest Conservation Act (FCA). Focusing on the spatial configuration of homes and forests, we compare subdivisions created before and after FCA implementation in 1993. We found minimal impacts of FCA on forest outcomes we considered: houses were as likely to be built in forest before and after FCA, and forest metrics showed increasing fragmentation with development unchanged by FCA regulation. However, the FCA led to a greater proportion of forest located away from houses after development. Other regulatory efforts, particularly zoning and riparian buffer regulations, were consistently related to outcomes we studied. FCA has been successful in preserving forest cover, but a stronger emphasis on connectivity and conservation of large forest patches, particularly for parcels with extensive forest cover, will be helpful in reducing fragmentation and disturbance with development.

Suggested Citation

  • Miranda H. Mockrin & David A. Newburn & John S. Stanovick, 2024. "Balancing development and forest conservation: the impact of Maryland’s Forest Conservation Act on spatial configuration of forest and housing," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(6), pages 1280-1302, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:6:p:1280-1302
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2023.2167194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2023.2167194
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2023.2167194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:6:p:1280-1302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.