IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v67y2024i13p3339-3358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The myth that military culture could not drive environmental sustainability? Cross-level influence of military culture on pro-environmental behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Feng-Yi Jiang
  • Tai-Wei Chang
  • Cheng-Ze Hung
  • Kuo-Ching Yen

Abstract

The promotion of sustainable development goals (SDGs) is a crucial government policy, and military units are government departments responsible for constructive affairs. However, few studies have explored the effects of perceived military social responsibility on environmental attitude and green organizational citizenship behavior. The present study addresses this research gap by developing a research framework regarding sustainability by applying organizational identity theory to the military. The results indicate that perceived military social responsibility is crucial in improving environmental attitude and green organizational citizenship behavior and promoting sustainable development. These results can be used as a reference by military units to achieve sustainable development goals and provide practical implications for sustainable management.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng-Yi Jiang & Tai-Wei Chang & Cheng-Ze Hung & Kuo-Ching Yen, 2024. "The myth that military culture could not drive environmental sustainability? Cross-level influence of military culture on pro-environmental behavior," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(13), pages 3339-3358, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:13:p:3339-3358
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2023.2222227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2023.2222227
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2023.2222227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:67:y:2024:i:13:p:3339-3358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.